Google
 

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Romney: Win not hollow By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer

Romney: Win not hollow By KEVIN FREKING, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 12 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said Sunday that low turnout and the absence of some notable opponents shouldn't diminish his win in Iowa's Republican Party Straw Poll.

ADVERTISEMENT

Romney said the straw poll did just what it was designed to do: Let candidates demonstrate support that could propel them to victory in the state's caucuses this winter.

He maintained that the decisions by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Sen. John McCain of Arizona to skip the event demonstrated his campaign's strength.

"I think if they thought they could have won, they would have been here," Romney said on Fox News Sunday. "If you can't compete in the heartland, if you can't compete in Iowa in August, how are you going to compete in January when the caucuses are held, and how are you going to compete in November of '08?"

Romney had been expected to win the test, largely an exercise reflecting a candidate's organizational strengths, because he spent millions of dollars and months of effort on the event.

Romney scored 4,516 votes, 31.5 percent, to outpace former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee who had 2,587 votes, 18.1 percent. Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback was third with 2,192 votes, 15.3 percent.

While Romney won handily, Huckabee argued it was his second place finish that should be the most important story coming out of the straw poll. Huckabee said his campaign had little money to spend and dedicated less than $100,000 to the straw poll.

"It wasn't just that we surprised people with a second showing, it's that we did it with so few resources," Huckabee said Sunday. "This really was feeding the 5,000 with two fish and five loaves."

Historically, the straw poll has helped winnow the field of presidential candidates and prior to the event Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson, who ran sixth, had said repeatedly his campaign was likely to end if he was not in the top two.

WITI-TV in Milwaukee reported Sunday that Thompson told one of its reporters he was dropping out of the race.

Thompson's campaign did not confirm the report immediately, not returning calls from The Associated Press in Wisconsin and Iowa.

"Candidates who finish in the bottom half of the straw poll should withdraw from the race and support the rest of the field," Thompson said on his campaign Web site in June.

Thompson finished in 6th place with 1,039 votes, which put him behind Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas.

He left the event before the results were announced Saturday evening and his campaign in Iowa said at the time he would make an announcement about his future within 48 hours.

Brownback and Huckabee had waged a fierce competition for the loyalty of influential social and religious conservatives.

Eight years ago, about 23,600 people voted in the straw poll. On Saturday, only about 14,300 did. Romney attributed the turnout to heat and the expectation that he would be a runaway victor.

"I got a higher percentage even than the president got eight years ago," Romney said. "It was a warm day, and actually, it was difficult turning people out."

Brownback called his third-place finish "a ticket on board to the caucuses" and downplayed Romney's victory.

"I think Mitt Romney has probably hit on top of his ceiling," said Brownback on ABC's "This Week."

Huckabee said his victory catapulted him to the top tier of candidates. He said those who declined to participate in the straw poll did not want to be embarrassed by a poor showing.

"What they did was forfeit the game," Huckabee said on CBS' Face the Nation. "If you forfeit, it's a loss. They knew they weren't going to do well with Iowa voters because Iowa voters tend to be far more conservative."

____

AP writer Mike Glover in Iowa contributed to this report.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Kevin,
I fought attacks by my children's mother for seven years in Mass. and GA before she "kidnapped" them back to Mass. Because I felt that violence against the court, GAL's and Lawyers was the only way to change a family court system that takes children from caring, non-abusive fathers and supports the abuse that women who perjury themselves to gain that support are willing to perpetrate, I decided to let go of my children. Why does our society minimize the emotional pain father's feel when our children are taken away from us? In addition, I would be damned if I would PAY her for this "kidnapping" of my children and the years of abuse I and my children had suffered as a result of her abuse of the family court system. In my case, her parents are rich (Erwin Cohen, Canton, MA) , so I didn't have to struggle with the issue of degrading my children's life in order to implement my beliefs that no one should be financially compensated for criminal acts like she has committed. You really need to start writing stories that inform the public about how married, responsible, middle-class fathers are having their children taken from them, denied fair and reasonable treatment in the family courts and how mothers are routinely allowed to get away with perjury in order to get all the benefits of our society's many processes built to destroy fatherhood. My case number is 98D1736DV1 in Norfolk County Massachusetts...see for yourself.
glenncmoore@yahoo.com

Google